+44 (0)800 464 0365

Aligning SAM Tools with Manual Declarations for Accurate Reporting

Many organisations utilise Software Asset Management (SAM) tools to automate the tracking of software assets.

In the dynamic realm of modern business operations, understanding what software is present in your IT estate, what is truly being utilised within your organisation, and what has been purchased to support those software assets are challenging tasks. The complexities of software discovery involve navigating through numerous layers of deployment data, contracts, and usage patterns.

There are 4 main difficulties businesses routinely encounter when attempting to unearth the software landscape within their estate, namely:

  • Gathering Data for Software Licensing Contracts
  • Identifying What Software Programs Are Actually in the Estate
  • Determining Where Software Programs Are in Use or Underutilised
  • Aligning SAM Tools with Manual Declarations for Accurate Reporting

In the last article in the series, this week we delve into the last of the difficulties – Aligning SAM Tools with Manual Declarations for Accurate Reporting.

Aligning SAM Tools with Manual Declarations for Accurate Reporting

Many organisations utilise Software Asset Management (SAM) tools to automate the tracking of software assets. However, aligning these tools with manual declarations from various departments is crucial for accurate reporting. Ensuring that these systems work in tandem enhances the precision of your software inventory. The quality of data maintained within the tool directly determines the quality of reports and data that can be exported. Challenges to quality data exports from SAM tools include:

Data Discrepancies and Inconsistencies

One of the primary challenges in aligning SAM tools with manual deployment declarations is the potential for data discrepancies and inconsistencies. Automated SAM tools rely on real-time data and system scans, while manual declarations may be subject to human error or time lags. However, if SAM agents do not cover 100% of an environment, or the data that has been input is faulty in some way, this can further exasperate discrepancies. Bridging the gap between these two sources of information requires meticulous attention to detail and ongoing reconciliation efforts.

Dynamic Nature of Software Deployments

Software deployments are dynamic, with updates, patches, and new installations occurring regularly, sometimes as often as daily. SAM tools aim to capture these changes in real time, but manual declarations may lag behind due to delays in reporting or oversight. Keeping both sources synchronised in the ever-evolving landscape of software deployments demands a proactive and adaptive approach.

Complex Licensing Models and Agreement Terms

Software licensing comes with many models and terms, and aligning SAM tools with manual declarations becomes intricate when dealing with these complexities. Different vendors may have varying licensing agreements, making it challenging to ensure that both automated and manual processes accurately reflect the terms and conditions of each agreement. Depending on the SAM tool used, the correct licensing metric may not be available, impacting the reporting and increasing the reliance on manual declarations.

User-Driven Updates and Changes

User-driven updates or changes to software configurations add another layer of difficulty. Manual declarations may capture these modifications, but SAM tools may be limited in the modifications they can capture, causing them to overlook certain adjustments or vice versa. Maintaining synchronisation between the two requires a comprehensive understanding of end-user activities and a proactive approach to documentation.

Integration Challenges with Legacy Systems

Organisations often have legacy systems that may not integrate with modern SAM tools. Aligning manual declarations with these legacy systems can be challenging, leading to information silos and potential inaccuracies in the overall SAM strategy. Overcoming integration challenges necessitates strategic investments in upgrading or replacing outdated systems.

Evolving Organisational Structures

Changes in organisational structures, such as mergers, acquisitions, or reorganisations, can introduce additional complexities. SAM tools and manual declarations must adapt to these changes seamlessly, ensuring the software asset management strategy remains aligned with the evolving business landscape.

Ultimately, pursuing a clear and accurate understanding of software presence within an estate is not a one-time endeavour; it's an ongoing commitment to optimising resources, ensuring compliance, and aligning technology investments with business objectives. By addressing these challenges head-on, organisations can embark on a journey toward a more efficient, secure, and strategically aligned software landscape that propels them into the future of business operations. The difficulties discussed in this blog post, from the elusive nature of Shadow IT to the rapid technological advancements, highlight the need for organisations to continuously adapt and refine their strategies. Embracing centralised inventory systems, leveraging technology solutions, fostering a culture of transparency, and staying vigilant against the evolving landscape of software usage are crucial elements in overcoming these challenges.


We’ll help you attain the best solution that ensures the best value outcome.

Arrange a free consultation

Cookies on Synyega

We use cookies on our website to give you a better experience, improve performance and for analytics. By using this website you agree to our privacy policy and the use of cookies